Search This Blog

Friday 29 June 2012

B-Day, 22 Days. Are you Ready?

We were teased before the new year with just under a minutes capture of what was to come in the trilogy, or the end perhaps? A sick commissioner Gordon, a washed up Bruce Wayne and a tired looking Alfred. Like poor Alfred had not already got his work cut out, he now has to deal with a multimillionaire who dresses up as a bat, more than once a year! Not forgetting a flash forward of who could cause the beginning of the end for the caped crusader, Bane! (yeah I used the term caped crusader...George Clooney flashback! Apologies)

Well, time went by, people lived their life and talked about how typically mean Christopher Nolan was to show such lack of activity upon the first trailer. Although lets not forget the term, Teaser? Yes, this is whats used to get Batman/movie fans going viral with their thoughts and opinions. (Vlogs...of course)

Anticipation is an extraordinary thing. It pays off when a second trailer is released, official. Two full minutes of Christopher Nolan's genius concept to be. The trailer shows us Bane, and the chaos to come. Hopefully Tom Hardy's Bane is as cold as he seems, although blowing up an entire football field isn't exactly a "sane" thing to do is it? . So Besides from the sneaky flick of Catwomen and washed up Bruce...again, the highlight of the release is the possible plot to the movie. Bane wants to end Gotham and its only hope for survival.

"When Gotham is in Ashes, then you will have my permission to die" Tom Hardy's Bane

So then there is the third and final piece to this ridiculous, yet acceptable build up to what could be the best super-hero movie ever. On that note, is it wrong to say super-hero? on the basis of it been Christopher Nolan's masterpiece? I mean lets face it, as much as Batman has a history of being the super-hero/caped crusader in the past, this trilogy seems far from a "Save the Day" novel.

There are numerous additions to this trailer. The intro shows Bane and his affiliates hijacking a plane, in mid-air! obviously! I can't help but flashback to the bank scene in the Dark Knight. We all remember the classic introduction to the Joker and what he was all about. A first taste of his tricks to come. Oh, and a grenade in the mouth! I would be guessing the hijacking of the plane might just be the intro to The Dark Knight rises. Why wouldn't it be? It will definitely work. Plus we would all be lying to ourselves if we say we are more excited to see the Batman than Tom Hardy's portrayal as Bane...?

"I will not bury you, iv buried enough members of the Wayne family" - Michael Cain's Alfred

So if the destruction of Bane was not enough to show in the previous trailer, this one will settle the mind, for a while anyway. We see two bridges in Gotham collapse, we see the football field again, which is still a cool scene. This trailer gains serious advantage in relation to others regarding specific characters in the movie. Catwomen for instance. Anne Hathaway? I'm not convinced. Not on the basis of her reputation as an actor, but Catwomen's overall presence and relevance to the movie is yet to convince me. Although the chemistry between Bruce and Cindy, of what we are shown anyway looks a brilliant blend. The dance scene in the trailer where Selina tells Bruce in the nicest way possible,

"Theres a storm coming Mr Wayne"...Cold and nostalgic in relation to "Batman Returns". Ps no matter the out-come of this movie, Michelle Pfeiffer will always be the true Catwomen.

"You dont owe these people anything" - Catwomen

The fact that Joseph Gordon-Levitt also joins the cast is anonymous. It was great to see his brief appearance and hopefully makes for a good character as I rate him highly as an actor. In fact, who is he supposed to be? I am guessing either a crazed Batman fan, a down in the dumps journalist, rookie cop perhaps? or, wait for it...ROBIN!!? (Please no)

So anyway the trailer shows more washed up Bruce Wayne. He seems exhausted, weak and bewildered. It seems this is were Bane takes advantage. But never worry, I am sure there is an eye-opening speech that Alfred has prepared for when master Bruce says "No more". There is an upgrade in Wayne technology of course. The bat-jet,...or plane or car. yes flying car. According to Batman, he tells Catwomen "It's not a car" (Horse throat). Batman? c'mon, it's a car, with wings. A pretty cool car that I cannot wait to explore with my beautiful ability to see. :)

That pretty much covers it until its release JULY 20. I will update my blog if necessary. Until then, good luck. Ps Below is an exclusive picture of Tom Hardy's Bane, without the suit! :)



Links to the three trailers released below.

* The Dark Knight Rises #3 [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5VDDJlsD6I]
* The Dark Knight Rises trailer #2 [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GokKUqLcvD8]
* The Dark Knight Teaser trailer [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Sktgm0aD8]

Thursday 28 June 2012

Red Lights Review 2012


It has been a rough few years for Robert De Niro. He deserves great credit for his continuity and sometimes desperate attempt at reviving that "Foot stomping" character that once brought his be- loving ego to our screens. Not that his success or noticeability has lessened, but I for one have witnessed some horrors featuring his face lately. 

Red Lights follows the story of psychologist Margaret Wilson (Weaver), along with her partner in paranormal crime, Tom Buckley (Cillian Murphy). They both travel the state seeking to expose those claiming to be factual based Psychics.

Margaret, who has seen and done it all before, distants herself from any beliefs such as religion and particularly the ability to perform such dark magic. Her past is a troubled one. She is famous for her debates and enthusiastic ways of revealing the fake to those who are paying to be lied to.

The job at hand is dull and becomes routine to Tom and Margaret as the movie starts by showing them in numerous situations where they both seem clearly aware of certain folks trying to make money from the gullible. It all seems quite mundane over their years of experience but It is only when Simon Silver returns to America after 30 years that begs the question. Is he as genuine as his reputation speaks for?

Simon (De Niro) is an original paranormal psychic, who has always claimed as well as having a cult following to this extraordinary power. As blind as can be, his abilities speak for themselves as he returns home to perform one last show. Tom, who is a very eager and ambiguous individual, sees this as an opportunity to expose the one guy the public would always believe in. Margaret, who has a past with Simon, warns Tom of his presence and the people around him.

As goes, the eventual plot (That takes so long to reach) is whether Simon holds the power he claims to have carried through-out a generation. It is clear he has an apparent past of healing, mind-reading, floating on air and numerous ways of wooing his audience.

As for "Red Lights", it is the term used by Margaret and Tom as as they seek to spot certain individuals roaming the area before a show begins. They apparently stick out and are always related to the performer in some way. (This is the performer’s way of sending people to infiltrate his audience to be. Their way of cheating the people).

The movie is indeed, awfully boring. It seemed a risky concept that in fact might have been original but unfortunately it felt slow, dull, and extremely irritating to watch at times taking into account the great actors trying to develop strong characters. You find the excuse to see this because of De Niro and the rest, but Red Lights does nothing for any of the guys involved. De Niro’s character Silver is blind, so on that note De Niro pulls off what seems a lazy performance in what almost seems like a forgetful cameo! It is strange because the reputation of the cast involved speaks for itself.

To be honest I was not sure if Red Lights were a horror or thriller flick? In fairness there were some jumpy scenes (Maybe one), but all in all, the movies climax was always failing, leading to a forgetful trip to the movies. A scene right after Simon Silver abandons a performance; it shows a streak of around eight journalists in a row. It seemed like it went on for almost ten minutes yapping about the incident in the rain making a big deal out of nothing! Indeed there are a numer of scenes you might find your mind shouting "NEXT"!

Red Lights can be frustrating at times the way it occasionally cuts to a cable TV screen, talking news stuff about how Silver came and left! It is just hard to care about this movie unfortunately.

Sigourney Weaver, Cillian Murphy and the rest gave a performance; I just think they chose a bad movie to represent...

Like most of these supernatural flicks they do tend to offer some nice twists, basically to change the mind of the audience last minute. Red Lights seemed destined to go down an unexpected road but left a climax that was indeed surprising but in no way memorable.

De Niro’s appearance is not surprising though. "Killer Elite"..."New Year’s Eve" “Righteous Kill” "Hide and seek"...what next?  Cillian Murphy was by far the best even though you could not care less whether he lives or dies in this flick!

I will say,  Elizabeth Olsen plays Sally, a student of Margret and Tom’s paranormal class. She tags alongside Tom while he sets the path to exposing the great Simon Silver! Elizabeth Olsen (3 of a kind?) has a bright future ahead of her...honestly she is quite good.

Overall: Boring and pretty Mundane = Skip

4/10

Wednesday 27 June 2012

Best Newcomer? VOTE FOR ME!


Haven just noticed that we, Ireland, share awards dedicated to those who share and create blogs across the country, recreationally, occupationally etc.
I would be honest enough to admit that my time writing about what I love has not been around as long as others, however I have remained consistent in writing about the weird and wonderful! The Joys of sharing my opinion to 10 or 20 people is a job well done for me.

So on that note, I have entered the awards for curiosity and experience.  “Best Newcomer” seemed the most relevant of categories in terms of the duration of my blog.

So read my writing if you have an interest and give the "Vote" button to your right a click. The website will take you from there.

Much appreciated and yours truly,

Gerry.

Monday 25 June 2012

The Five-Year Engagement Review 2012

So before Jason Segel was to revel in success, he was advised by a good friend in the movie industry. That good friend was a guy by the name of Nicholas Stoller. That advice was on the basis of being a true success out in movie-land (Hollywood) and in order for his talents to be identified, he must write and create his own characters.

Since then he has done wonders, including the hilarious "Forgetting Sarah Marshall"(2008), "Get him to the Greek"(2011) as well as a memorable resurrection of "The Muppets"(2011). He returns to the screen with long-time friend Emily Blunt in The Five Year Engagement.

Tom (Segel) is a long-time chef in San-Francisco. A well established one at that, he is destined to spend the rest of his life with Violet (Blunt). After only a year since they met, in what was hilarious circumstances, Tom proposes to Violet in what is quite the funny introduction to Tom's awkward ego. Awkward being an understatement.

Both seem financially settled as Violet's career in psychology seems to reach new heights everyday. Things turn sour when Violet receives an invitation into what seems a once in a life time opportunity, the unfortunate thing for Tom is that the position she dreams of is in Michigan! The prospect of life in snowy temperatures sails over the head of Tom as he shows his desire to Violet by agreeing the move, believing his cooking abilities will be an advantage else where.

As Tom is destined for a revived career in Michigan, he struggles to find a position to his standard. (previously a head chef).

The comedy evolves through-out the time of the movie, as well as the time in the movie! A five year engagement may seem acceptable to those suffering financially, but in Tom and Violet's circumstances, the reality is that the people around them are dying waiting on this wedding to happen...literally!

Tom's best friend and former cook buddy Alex (Chris Pratt) is hilarious with his constant irritating, childish behaviour! What was once Tom's life back home, is now run by Alex. To make matters worse for Tom and Violet, Alex marries Violet's sister in such short time, in what slowly evolves into a game of envy and jealousy!

As Tom quickly struggles with life in Michigan, Violet is loving her new position as she fights off her former lover and current boss Winton (Rhys Ifans) who appears destined to help Violet settle into her new life. Although Violet and Tom have a faithful relationship, it is when Violet's love for psychology and Tom's desire to hurry the wedding that result in a clash of fate and different desires that adds a touch of drama to this Rom-com.

The Five year engagement succeeds with it's hilarious round-up of numerous characters who individually know how to make this movie their own. Violet's cast of new workmates are genius as she tries adjusting to the weirdness and seriousness of each individual.

Watch as family members anticipating this so-called wedding cry for help as we get to see matters worsen for poor Tom Solomon. As people around Tom are moving on, living in what appears a better life back home, Tom struggles with the workmates of his new position...and his insanity!

The Five year Engagement is definitely worth a watch, although any comparison to the previous work of Jason Segel will be left for yourself. As for me, I went into this movie with little or no hope as I avoided "Jeff who lives at home" (Was that a mistake?) and I really disliked "I love you man". Apart from minor screen roles, I rate Jason Segel highly and believe with certain comedians (former I should say) truly stuffed their careers with rubbish movies, Mr Segel will continue to entertain us!

Overall: Surprisingly funny and worth a watch

Sunday 17 June 2012

Insidious Review 2012


Insidious is a classic piece of work released in 2010. It follows the Horror slash chiller path, representing a genre that has failed cinemas for the past 10 years . Certain Horror movies have made a significant mark in cinema history, dating as far back to the genuis work in "It"(1990), Halloween (1978), "Friday the 13th (1980) and "A Nightmare on elm street"(1984). Those few of many classics are fine examples of the word, "Horror" as they were successful in frightening the audience, leaving visual implants into the brain of the average viewer. If you are still thinking of a movie that scared you mentally and physically before you go to bed at night? that movie had done it's job. If you find yourself watching it for the next 20 years or so, it is indeed a classic. Similar to my examples above. Another example, Insidious.

Dalton Lambert (Ty Simpkins) falls suddenly into a catastrophic coma following an accident in the family's abandoned attic. The parents, Josh and Renai are bewildered to the result that follows as Dalton is hospitalised before being transferred home to be treated further more.

The Coma appears far from basic as several months on reveal Dalton is no closer to being revived. It is when spiritual happenings occur through-out the house that Renai (Rose Byrne) begins to question the possible relation to the apparent haunting and her son, Dalton.

Josh (Patrick Wilson) is your typical male, ideal father. Although he is paranoid for the safety of his son, he does not believe in Paranormal activity. The films disturbing plot is seen through the eyes of Renai and Josh as we watch their creepy situations come to life. As Dalton lies lifeless in his bed, both parents are caught up in haunting visions and disturbing sounds as whatever it is stalking the family home, it appears to be coming from Dalton's room.

In a desperate bid to seek and rid the house of the evil spirits, Renai invites paranormal doctor Elise (Lin Shaye) in a last ditch attempt to convince herself that she is not going insane. The Inclusion of Lin Shaye proved a touch of class as the result of her inclusion is highly memorable, offering a more darker feel than her character "Elise" originally intended.

A haunting tale with a slight twist, Insidious looks and feels awesome. The movie is shot with a dull shade of grey, giving off a depressing feel to what seems ever so real. There are some jumpy scenes that will guarantee the awakening of the average viewer.

A great introduction with a snip of relation to the vintage Hammer production, with a frightening violin tune that the mind will struggle to erase once the movie comes to a climax. Without saying too much about such a clever and tense concept, it is a plot that should be truly revealed in a dark room, by yourself!

This review is based off my viewing of Insidious the second time around. I am delighted to say it scared me senseless, just as it did upon its original release.

Taking into account what we have seen over the years, Insidious finishes top with one of the best horror movies of the past ten years. The last movie released that blends into this category is "Drag Me to Hell" by Sam Raimi . Also a must see for all horror fans.

Insidious did all the right things for me. It had me shook in a disturbing way, a way that makes me want to witness its crafty work over and over again.

Monday 11 June 2012

The Terminator: An epic past, a forgetful future


In 1984, Kyle Reese was sent from the future to protect the present...not that I remember his visit.

Just mid-way through what was the continuity of retro style 80's in-dependency. For some, their cinematic experience was about to change forever with the release of The Terminator (1984) starring the already populated Hollywood star, Arnold Schwarzenegger. Nobody, not even the man himself knew the explosive reception and ambiance that was about to flood the audience with a new dosage of fear.

A smartly created cyborg  (Schwarzenegger) sent back through time, is assigned and programmed to assassinate Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton), a waitress at a local restaurant. Oblivious to the meaning and impact her death could have, Sarah is bewildered to find other females associated with the same name being murdered in the days before her own encounter with the killing machine.

Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn) is the other piece to the puzzle who is conveniently sent back from the not too distant future to assist and create the survival of Sarah Connor.

A battle of the greats, man versus machine, The Terminator started it all. This concept was as tense and high-octane as it came in 1984. Sarah Connors "Tecnoir" situation, the first encounter for both Sarah and the Terminator (T-800). In fact, the 80's dance club brought Kyle Reese to his protective objective in what seems unfortunate circumstances. But before they can develop lust for one another, there was only survival for one. As far as Reese was concerned, he was sent to protect Sarah, even if that means dying with the human like cyborg.

"The 600 series had rubber skin. We spotted them easy, but these are new. They look human... sweat, bad breath, everything. Very hard to spot. I had to wait till he moved on you before I could zero him". - Kyle Reese

"Il Be back". Them chilling words from the Terminator, moments before he gate-crashes the police station protecting Sarah Connor. Literally one of the most vicious, cold-blooded killing streaks I have ever witnessed in a movie. As a kid, witnessing this for the first time is haunting, but yet pleasuring the more times you see the movie. Watch and embrace as the mindless machine patrols the corridors of the station blasting out at least 50 cops with Double-barrel shotguns, M16s, UZI's, and the famous "45 Long slide with laser sighting".

"Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead".
- Kyle Reese


I still wonder to this day, after numerous viewings, is The Terminator a horror movie, or action genre? In my opinion, I would like to say both. When I first laid eyes on this work of art (1998) it scared the crap out of me, and that's why I am still in love with it to this day. The classic introduction, the "Terminator" anthem. When them letters come together before the first scene, you know its on, and you know, that even if its your tenth viewing, you are going to experience a movie like no other...again.

Terminator 2: Judgement Day: Like no other? Well let me tell you something, 7 years later, James Cameron returned with a sequel that was about to blow the 90's movie industry wide open. Terminator 2: Judgement Day was released in 1991. The exciting thing I believe then was the cast involved. Critics and audience global were welcomed to once again join Linda Hamilton as the ever evolving Sarah Connor.

Following the death of brave soldier Kyle Reese and her spell of survival with a killing machine, Sarah is in what seems a highly concentrated mental institution. After an apparent attempt to blow up Skynet (a high-tech production company which in Sarah's eyes believes will be the cause and creation of machines that will attempt to take over the world, hence 84"s terminator from the future).

New to the saga is John Connor, the son of Sarah and deceased father, Kyle Reese. The plot follows as a new creation is sent from the not set future, the T-1000. Not a machine but a form of shape-shifting abilities that can create and mould itself into different humans, materials, weapons etc. He is sent to once again change the future by assassinating John Connor. Why? because he is the apparent leader of the future resistance (last of the human soldiers) who what Sarah believes will help prevent the machines from wiping out the human race.

Note: Those who have not seen these movies might be confused. Basically if Sarah Connor was killed in the first by the machine, there would have been no John Connor so there would have been no significant individual to prevent the machines taking over in what is called Judgement day.  So, because she and Kyle Reese helped destroy the threat prior, a new threat is created (more advanced) to kill, who is now the primary target, the son (future leader) John Connor. If the T-1000 succeeds in what the previous did not, Judgement Day will not be prevented.

Introducing the equivalent to Kyle Reese, The Terminator model 101 (Schwarzenegger). An updated and newly programmed cyborg sent to protect John Connor. The Terminator is obviously considered a more reliable protector to Kyle who although accomplished his objective previously, machine over human is an obvious advancement.

"3 billion human lives ended on August 29th, 1997. The survivors of the nuclear fire called the war Judgement Day. They lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the machines. The computer which controlled the machines, Skynet, sent two Terminators back through time. Their mission: to destroy the leader of the human resistance, John Connor, my son." - Sarah Connor - T2 Intro

T2 was quite obviously an updated account to what was revealed to fans in 84". Schwarzenegger is now the protector rather than the villain, in what some fans might say was a great choice. (although T2 is as classic as they come, I adored the bloody mess Arnold made in 84"). Robert Patrick was a fantastic addition as the sequels relentless villain. The T-1000 gives as little chance as a terminator as he too takes it to the extreme and stops at nothing to accomplish what seems a "MUST" objective for the machines future. Edward Furlong plays the wonderful character of John Connor and demonstrates his brave ego as he quickly develops into the soldier the future expects of him.

In terms of effects and well to be quite honest, acting, T2 runs a mile as the all round cast and final production is sweet.

The Chase scene: This is the explosive introduction between John and the terminator. The T-1000 quickly tracks the where-abouts of John and his unfortunate foster parents. Aware of the threat to the boy, the terminator finds John before the metamorphosis killer can lay hands on him. This leads to an epic chase in which John is dragged onto the terminators bike as they are both chased through back alleys by the T-1000 who is pursuing in none other than a bad ass truck! A tense and eye-opening scene as the Terminator does his utmost in using a wicked shotgun, blowing holes through the liquidising life-form, leaving what is unfortunate to be bullet wounds that the T-1000 shows its tremendous ability to heal...very quickly!

"On August 29th, 1997, it's gonna feel pretty fucking real to you too. Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is gonna have a real bad day. Get it?" - Sarah Connor responds to Dr. Silbeman.

T2 Judgement Day appears to be a huge fan favourite and will continue to be. From start to finish, it moves at a fast pace, with its cold blooded concept and wicked acting from both Linda Hamilton and Edward Furlong. Although I would never compare both originals, T2 does have a slight advantage in terms of it being a brilliant drama. It is, and will continue to be listed as one of the greatest movies ever made along with a peak that Arnold Schwarzenegger would never rise above!

Terminator: Rise of the Machines: 12 years on, a director by the name of Jonathan Mostow was to officially stamp a third chapter to what was now, a trilogy. As far as we where concerned, T2 left off in epic fashion and emotional credits. Arnold Schwarzenegger was on the verge of becoming the Governor of California. Why? I fail to understand. Anyway, each to their own as they say. In the year he was to be crowned the governor, he managed to squeeze in, what was the release of T3.

John Connor (Nick Stahl) is now in his late 20's, washed up, hanging around bridges drinking booze as someone who was once a clever, arrogant young kid, is now an alcoholic. Oh it hurts to exclude Edward Furlong. He explains his situation reflecting a brief past and describes his current life as constantly on the move, staying under the radar from any opposing threat to his life. Once again, a threat from the future is sent to wipe out the only hope for the human resistance, Sir John. A new era of course, a new villain.

T-X aka Terminatrix (Kristanna Loken) is the lucky gal. She is a human-like cyborg, just like the previous terminators, except way more advanced in terms of investigation and high-tech weaponry and skills. I must add though, she is less a threat than the T-1000 ever was. I mean, anyone can guess that from her first appearance. Now, that is not being sexist is it? I mean I agree women have a place in the terminator saga (Hamilton), she just has to be at least half relevant and not a villain. In my opinion.

So it seems a weak John Connor expected the return of something at some stage in his life-time. He is now lonesome after the death of his mother Sarah. Yes, they killed her off...what Hope have we now? Well there is still hope for Johns origin to be lived out as another terminator model (Model 101) is sent back to protect the soldier to be. We also get introduced to the future wife of John, Kate (Claire Danes). A slight twist to this puzzle is Kate's father is a U.S force General at Sky-Net and controls the military computer systems that lead to the machines take-over. (a virus from sky-net infects the machines).

Lets touch on Arnold's 12 year return to the genre that boosted his career. He once again plays a cyborg. A newly programmed model (as usual). Prior to the movies eager release, I remember reading that Jonathan Mostow was set to make it a rated 12 audience. Why? not an exact quote, but something along the lines of, "I want a young generation as well as mature to witness my account of the terminator". In other terms, he wanted to be greedy and widen his audience, fearing that those who grew up around the originals will laugh and spit in his face for mocking such a saga. apologies.

Back to the new model. Arnold returns in particular, obvious fashion. As we seen previously, he rocks the dark shades every time. He attempts to do so in the introduction only to find he is wearing star shaped costume glasses. An attempt at humour from Mostow that I have no doubt was funny at the time, but now I ask, why? well, it is rated 12's.

Another ridiculous scene where Arnie is stuffing a basket full of food with an ageing John in a local supermarket. As the terminator proceeds to leave without paying, the shopkeeper shouts "Hey, and a newly constructed Arnie sticks his hand in the guys face and responds with "Talk to the hand" and walks out. Again, we get the attempted humour, why? well, after all it is rated 12's.

A bad move in my opinion. He clearly went in with his own concept, which is fine, and actually didn't do too bad trying to relate it to the previous movies, but for me, it completely lost that seriousness that made the originals so successful and left a staunchly result of an unnecessary parody.

In fairness to Mostow, the action scenes, quite obviously they were eye-catching as it was now 2003 and CGI (Computer generated Imagery) was at its best then. One of very few memorable scenes was a highway chase which was quite nostalgic in relation to T2. It did, in fairness look excellent as there were all sorts of chaos going on, as we witness once again the desperate attempt from the T-X to get to Connor as she looks to crush John and his protector with a crane on wheels!...seriously.

As for connecting dots relating to the previous successors, Rise of the Machines sticks to the terminator survival concept but lacks any ability to make the story sound as serious and relevant as it should be. There are no particular rise of the machines. We just assume when John and Kate make it to the bomb shelter in the end, the machines are rising. Something myself and I am sure most wanted to see more of. Instead we witnessed the constant worthless attempt of the T-X trying ever so hard to bitch slap Arnie and kill John. I think this is the only terminator movie I actually wanted to see a so-called hero die. I mean John Connor just wants to be put out of his misery in this return. The future of Sky-net should have sent another T-1000 for gods sake!

Rise of the Machines was mediocre in terms of entertainment. Other than that, on the basis of bad actor replacements and slapstick humour, T3 is highly forgettable.

Terminator Salvation: A whole new gathering of actors, writers, directors led to what was revealed to be a positive return to the franchise. Although one change of vision was the exclusion of Arnie as he was, by now well settled into his crocodile skinned governors chair. Was this a good thing? yes it was. It was time to move on, a change of pace if you like. Also taking into account the only positive thing that came from his last appearance was a fatter wallet and the usual "Hasta La Vista". But something tells us we had not seen the last of the sleazy Austrian. (Sleazy, as in he takes a liken to his own maid it seems).

John Connor (Bale) is now in control of what was surely the foreseeable future. It is the year 2018 and Connor is the only survivor of the unsuccessful attack on a Sky-net facility (Where T3 left off).

After a decade of fight and survival to prevent the machines from taking over, there is nothing but rubble, abandoned buildings an human-made shelters and facilities for those remaining. John Leads a team of soldiers (resistance) in its war against Sky-net. We see a young Kyle Reese (Anton Yelchin) who is a clever individual who like the remaining humans, is trying to stay alive. He remains unfazed and anonymous as he is yet to meet the leader (His son) John Connor. The plot focuses around the companionship between Kyle and Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington). Marcus is the new Terminator, although he himself is unaware of his powerful abilities, as he is manufactured the same, but he has feelings and human like organs which is a first. He too is constructed to end the war against the humans. although Marcus is oblivious to his placement in the war, his once human walk of life affects his position and begins to question what he is, and why was he brought back this way?

As John is unaware of Reese's existence, he continues to make routine radio transmissions through-out the city's remains, calling on all survivors to stay strong, survive, as he believes patience is the key to beating the machines. As Connor and crew focus on a possible loophole in Sky-net, it is when he stumbles across an apparent survivor brought into base by Williams (Moon Bloodgood), yes that is her real surname.

 The survivor is Marcus. It isn't long before John arouses a suspicion concerning the origin of Marcus and the reason he is alive. Things get under way when Connor discovers Marcus to be a cyborg and demands for its termination as he has deep concerns for his crew and himself who is the key to seeing out this war.

"I knew it. I knew it was coming. But this is not the future my mother warned me about. And in this future, I don't know if we can win this war. This is John Connor." - John Connor

What does Salvation offer? well, a whole new concept in what feels so far from where the Terminator originated. Although one can not fault a brave attempt at something the fans waited ever so long for, its concept of John eventually teaming up with Marcus to find Kyle Reese is extremely unbelievable. Yes John has his doubts at first, after all, he did witness the development and decease of both his mother and a Terminator he had once looked up to. He does not take any chances at first, but when you are watching the movie, it seems an obvious choice for him to join forces with Marcus as the terminator is the key to offering the resistance a one chance opportunity to infiltrate, and destroy Sky-net once and for all.

The fourth instalment is however unique in terms of the design, action and its overall appearance regarding the lack of CGI that still led to an extraordinary result. (T3 used CGI for the Skeleton models etc. Salvation went old school and created Worthington's Skeleton).

Christian Bale as Connor can hardly go wrong as his career speaks for itself, but did he have to inherit his Batman voice for John Connor? Maybe it is just his persona in general I wonder? well, after the rant leaked online I was left highly excited as we as the fans felt the performance coming prior to the movies release. So on that note, Bale done tremendous as the boss man slash future soldier. In fact it is unfortunate to say in fact he carried the movies will and desire. Sam Worthington at the time was an amateur and got his first big blockbuster. I liked his debut, but now he remains an amateur as unfortunately for the guys acting credentials, I can not stand the sight of him.

"You and me, we've been at war since before either of us even existed. You tried killing my mother, Sarah Connor. You killed my father, Kyle Reese. You will not kill me." - One of very few memorable scenes as John comes face to face with Worthington's terminator.

Anton Yelchin was decent as Kyle Reese. You can see the charismatic similarities to the original actor, Michael Biehn.

Although the movies plot is also based on a weakness discovered by the resistance that could be a possible dismantle of the machines, it never really developed a significant affect. I mean we are talking a possible end to a war that was for seed for nearly a century. It does outclass the previous movie in terms of seriousness, which is quite significant in relation to its grandparents.

It was original as we got to see the war (I don't even know if it is Judgement Day at this stage) The out-come for certain personalities such as John and Kyle Reese also gave the movie a hint of nostalgia but it is so hard to offer the same love to the characters as you do in the originals.

The Terminator, Marcus Wright is nothing less than anonymous, as you do root for the resistance but you wonder why they even bothered writing in Washington's character. The movie could have stuck to the war concept we see so rarely in Salvation, rather than writing in an unnecessary distraction that was Marcus Wright.

The result in terms of entertainment and blockbuster action will please any movie buff looking for a good time and maybe some clarity, taking into account the disappointment of T3. Unfortunately like most movies today, comparing them to 70s, 80s, 90's classics is pointless and will always be a waste of time. It is true, the industry have provided us with some unforgettable work. It is great to see Steven Spielberg, Ridley Scott, and James Cameron provide us with their beautiful vision and mesmerising concepts to this day. But their movie credentials origin from the past, not the future.

When Christian Bale said "Il be back" towards Terminator Salvations climax, I'd decided I have had enough.

The Terminator will always be credited for its epic past, and forgetful future... "Hasta La Vista baby!




For more classic Terminator quotes, click IMDB's link below.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/quotes













Friday 8 June 2012

American Pie: Reunion Review 2012


Jim, Stifler and the rest of the gang return for one last gag. A high school reunion.

It has been 13 years since the release of what was surely one of the best teen comedies of the late 90s. American Pie was, and still is a classic piece of work. Unfortunately I can't say the same for the sequel nor the "Wedding". So what does the latest instalment offer?

A number of years have passed since Jim accepted ditsy Michelle as his lawfully wedded wife. How times have changed for the virgin slash pie lover. Jim Can't seem to find the time and enjoyment he once experienced as his responsibilities include his very own infant. As we see in the trailer things are not going so well for the couple, both are lacking ambition to please each-others sexual needs.

Just like Jim, the rest of the crew have moved on living life as a real adult. A brief reunion between Finch, Oz and Kevin lead to the idea and planning of a high school college reunion. But hey, just like the wedding, do not tell the funniest guy in the movie what is happening, Stifler.

So quite obviously, Stifler finds out and there you have your attempted comedy as Stifler is once again the genius behind the antics he so forcefully drags his buddies into.

Some funny scenes involve the grown men hanging out at beach parties with 16 year old girls etc. There are some nostalgic scenes and some same old material. As always Jim is the victim as he is found embarrassed in some oddly funny circumstances.

I laughed my butt off of what clearly seems ridiculous now as I reminisce on its concept. Once again, Stifler is the joker and if anything probably the one tiny excuse the audience will to use to see the latest instalment.

Unfortunately the film lacks any relation to the word that follows American pie, Reunion? No, far from it. The movie is indeed the same slapstick as the "wedding" as it is at least 95 minutes before the audience get to see any of the previous characters.

American Pie reunion was a laugh of course but I just wanted to see more of the nostalgic characters like the "Sherminator" etc. Instead we got the same old stuff in what seems to become terribly childish and boring. In relation to the previous movie, it is funnier than the wedding (just about) and maybe even Part 2 (its been a while). The chances of you laughing at the stupidity of Jim and Stifler are very high which is genuinely obvious but this reunion is worth one watch only as the future for American pie lies in the past as we will always choose to giggle at the 99" classic that started it all.

I can not help but think the reason behind the latest comedy is the lack of industry work for the cast of the saga. It seems quite obvious as we have really only seen Sean William Scott hit our movie screens with his wacky character "The Goon". Unfortunately for most of the cast, American Pie seems the only route available. Although, would you want to see them in anything else? I mean as brilliantly quirky Jason Biggs can be, he has never really warmth to a successful career.

So all in all, the reunion is a good time in the cinema as we seem to always enjoy the hilarious consequences and filthy scenes involving a group of guys who some might say, have wanted to be one or two of these egos. I for one wanted to be Finch!







































Tuesday 5 June 2012

Prometheus Review 2012

Ridley Scott cut the anticipation on June 1st releasing the eagerly awaited Prometheus to cinematic screens everywhere.

Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender and Charlize Theron lead a promising cast in this Sci-fi whirl-wind exploring once again, the genre that brought Ridley Scott's ego to light.

Elizabeth Shaw (Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Green) spend their days exploring caves and landscapes seeking clues, leading to conspiracies, leading to self-belief of the numerous possibilities and unanswered questions behind mankind's creation. Their obsessive will for exploration pays off when they discover what they believe is the key direction to the life-form that walked before us. The loved up pair can't help but accept a thousand year old carving to be an open invitation to join whatever it may be they seek.

Prometheus is the holding vessel carrying a crew of numerous qualifications. The Journey through space is constructed by Shaw and Holloway, with both of them being the navigational system to the universe they are destined to arrive in. Idris Elba plays Janek, the captain of Prometheus. He represents a strong character, ever so careful as to why he, as well as others should risk their life believing in Shaw's ambitions.

Meredith (Theron) is on board for one reason only, to see the journey out safe while so obviously wanting nothing to do with the desires of both Holloway and Shaw. From what Meredith can see, this is a far-fetched idea and a pointless journey...how wrong she was about to be. Theron is once again the bitch in the movie. Sure why not? she plays it ever so sexy!.

The journey through one universe to the other leads Prometheus into a battle that could change history. Upon an amazing discovery through the ambitious Shaw and Holloway, their mysterious yet expected find leads the ship and crew into a fight not only for their own lives, but the lives of others.

Prometheus is a brilliant sci-fi movie as Michael Fassbender helps by leading the movie to the enjoyment it Deserves. Introducing his robotic character, David. He is constructed by Peter Weyland to have as much interaction and affiliation with a human, as one human would be to another. His hilarious, soulless body is well created to the point where the viewer believes in Fassbenders' desire to act. David is the back-Bone to the ship, as the crew appear unfastened to rest their lives in his hands. A darker side to Fassbenders' character is surprisingly exciting, giving Prometheus tense interactions both on and off the vessel.

Prometheus is as mysterious as the trailer makes it out to be. Ridley Scott does fantastic in returning to the concept of Aliens, but not "Alien". Just like his previous movies, without naming the obvious, Ridleys' way of creating likable characters is still smartly written with his latest work appearing highly nostalgic. The audience will realise the ship descending into the unknown and where you will once again find yourself rooting for certain characters to make it home. There are always individuals on board who you know are either too arrogant or unqualified to be on such a mission. Prometheus does well in offering the audience a general mix of personalities.

However, it does, like most movies with a great introduction reveals some loose ends with an explanation much needed if Ridley Scott was to return for a Prometheus sequel. The first 100 minutes or so are quite tense and does well in keeping the audience attention and anticipating a possible unforgettable climax. Prometheus will disappoint some fans on the basis of what I and most would believe to be a highly rushed ending to the movie. The production just seemed to run out of ideas in the last 20 minutes or so. Maybe that is the appropriate result and much deserved outcome for a film that got the wrong attention and anticipation and seemed to have manipulated fans awaiting its release ever since its first statement which claimed Prometheus to be a prequel to alien...

There is so much to be said about Ridleys' return, but so much the audience must answer for themselves. Prometheus is an all-round bloody good sci-fi movie. A concept not too original but fans of the Alien saga will enjoy without having to connect any apparent dots.

A prequel originally, but I believe Ridley Scott himself fails to agree. Prometheus is its own concept, with some convenient characters. A must see for all Sci-fi fans, leaving a positive result in a return to chilling torture in outer space that no other director would dare to challenge. Oh except for James Cameron. :)